The cryptocurrency sector is overflowing with dead projects


In 2017, when every part involved with cryptocurrency and blockchain nonetheless seemed contemporary and fascinating, it appeared that there can be no day and not using a new “revolutionary” venture or thought. Decentralized monetary system, decentralized torrent tracker, decentralized workplace documentation system. Decentralized, decentralized, decentralized.

The overuse of phrases like “clear,” “distributed” and “blockchain-based” quickly made most press papers look generic. The nearer we obtained to the peak of the Bitcoin price on the finish of 2017, the extra absurd the names of recent initiatives turned: “Ethereum-based cost system for slaughterhouse business staff,” “decentralized blockchain-based dwarf horse breeding platform,” “peer-to-peer private banking service for divorced blind folks,” and so forth.

Who would ever want any of that, one would possibly ask. Properly, in lots of instances, no person. Of the a number of thousand cryptocurrencies launched because the unfold of blockchain know-how, solely about 30 are presently of any funding interest.

Following cryptocurrencies, many crypto exchanges launched on the wave of blockchain recognition are dying — they only don’t have anything to commerce anymore. The state of affairs is particularly seen on overview platforms, which retailer playing cards of a whole lot of closed initiatives, typically along with indignant consumer opinions.

Let’s check out just a few initiatives and analyze the explanations for his or her failure.

Telegram Open Community, or TON

In late 2017 to early 2018, it was first reported that Telegram was planning to launch its own blockchain platform and native cryptocurrency.

Also called Grams, the TON cash had been meant to be based mostly on Telegram Open Community, with the TON blockchain on the core of the platform. Within the venture white paper, the builders presented this future coin as a possible normal cryptocurrency that might be used for the common change of worth in every day life.

It was acknowledged that whereas Bitcoin (BTC) was considered “digital gold” and Ethereum was a platform for token crowd gross sales, this new TON cryptocurrency can be an alternative choice to conventional cash and conventional cost programs comparable to Visa and Mastercard. In response to the white paper, different cryptocurrencies lacked the qualities required to draw a mass client. In its flip, Telegram would have the ability to implement a system eligible for mass use, given its experience in encrypted distributed knowledge storage, expertise in creating user-friendly interfaces, and an infinite consumer base.

Whereas the corporate did have some extent in a part of its claims, to me all of it seemed like an enormous PR marketing campaign. Why ought to Telegram implement this new monetary system and never some company with expertise within the monetary providers business? How wouldn’t it have the ability to distinguish this new foreign money from different, related merchandise? How wouldn’t it be any higher than conventional monetary programs being carried out by a big centralized firm?

No solutions got. Nonetheless, the Telegram preliminary coin providing, launched in 2018, was an enormous success. The corporate was in a position to raise $1.7 billion from investor funds in two non-public token sale rounds, and that was actually promising.

Associated: Exclusive: New report reveals details of Telegram’s TON blockchain

However it didn’t finish effectively. On Might 12, 2020, Pavel Durov introduced that Telegram would formally terminate its involvement with the project after an extended authorized battle with the US Securities and Change Fee. Certainly, the corporate didn’t have the authorized assets mandatory for implementing such an formidable thought. More than likely, technical difficulties and robust competitors in the marketplace additionally performed a task.

Associated: SEC vs. Telegram: Part 1 — Key takeaways for now

For me, this case epitomizes the entire cryptocurrency hysteria of 2018 — an organization that will get concerned in an enterprise for which it’s not prepared, both legally or technologically, and not using a clear positioning of the product. The top result’s failure.


Petchains was offered as the longer term international info administration system and buying and selling platform for the pet market. In response to its press papers, the system would enable its customers to keep up and preserve knowledge of the animals dwelling in houses and shelters. The offered venture goal was to create a group of pet homeowners, consultants, professionals, establishments, service suppliers and volunteers. The system was meant to be developed utilizing blockchain and large knowledge applied sciences as normal. The preliminary funding was going to be gathered by way of the method of an preliminary coin providing.

It’s a superb query if the world actually wants a blockchain-based info and buying and selling platform for the pet market. I wouldn’t say there are various issues with over-centralization there. Pet retailers are normally chosen by clients after analyzing model repute and on-line presence.

Some issues that clients on this market might face embody unreliable details about the acquired animal’s well being or earlier homeowners. Nonetheless, these difficulties comprise not a technical, however a authorized drawback that’s unlikely to be solved utilizing blockchain know-how.

Furthermore, since animal welfare legal guidelines differ between totally different nations, making a unified worldwide platform on this area is a legally difficult activity, hardly appropriate for a small technological startup.

The Petchain venture staff consisted primarily of no-names who had no confirmed expertise in any severe initiatives. It was not even attainable to say for certain whether or not these had been actual folks — a few of the venture advisors turned out to have been presented with faux pictures.

Regardless of some advertising and marketing efforts, no severe funding was drawn to the venture. In the intervening time, the official web site of the venture is inactive and its social media accounts haven’t been up to date for greater than a 12 months. The hyperlink that used to result in the venture’s white paper now incorporates a textual content describing on the whole phrases the explanations for failures within the cryptocurrency business.

Wiki token

Yet another useless venture with an incoherent, not thought-through thought on the base of it.

Wiki token (WIKI) was an Ethereum-based, ERC-20 appropriate token designed for use as a way of cost on the so-called Crypto College. This future platform, constructed across the Bitcoin Wiki venture, was described as a very impartial, decentralized, censorship-free academic system.

The training programs for Crypto College had been meant to be created by members of the venture group. For writing articles and creating programs, these members would get the beforehand talked about ERC-20 Wiki tokens. These tokens can be listed on varied crypto exchanges and might be spent on different Crypto College programs.

I first seen this venture in 2018, and it didn’t make a lot sense proper from the start. To start with, what sort of secret information is there within the cryptocurrency business that it needs to be distributed utilizing token-based cost programs? How wouldn’t it compete with different content material, out there without cost?

Theoretically, it’s attainable to create a platform just like Coursera based mostly on blockchain. Crypto College, like Coursera, might turn into a platform that brings collectively creators and customers of academic supplies. However right here, some difficulties come up.

The worth of an academic product is normally based mostly on the repute of its creators. A lot of the programs at Coursera are college teaching programs created by well-known, extremely respected establishments. These programs embody interplay with a trainer, who can be a widely known training skilled. Upon completion of a course, college students normally obtain certificates acknowledged by firms and academic establishments. All these elements add as much as the worth of the course, and it’s because of them that persons are keen to pay for it.

In its flip, the Wiki token venture might hardly supply any of the above. No collaboration with massive establishments or famend educators. Furthermore, the extremely specialised space of ​​experience (cryptocurrency and blockchain) chosen didn’t indicate the presence of academic professionals who might doubtlessly create priceless academic content material. Why wouldn’t it be any higher than free YouTube movies or simply searchable web articles?

What we see right here is simply one other technical embodiment of a doubtful enterprise thought. Having neither a well-thought-out idea nor a product, the staff rushed to implement it utilizing trendy know-how. The result’s a technical wrapper with no content material and no curiosity outdoors of blockchain hysteria.

As of October 2020, the venture’s web site is now not out there and its social media accounts have been useless for a few years.


The initiatives listed above didn’t in actual fact supply something besides technical execution that was trendy on the time. Unexpectedly launched on the wave of blockchain recognition, with no market or viewers analysis, they had been unable to supply any significant worth to a possible buyer.

One of many key advertising and marketing guidelines: Promote the issue to be solved, not the product you supply. Product builders ought to all the time take into consideration client wants first. In any other case, they danger ending up in the identical manner because the builders of the initiatives talked about above — creating solely product packaging that has no intrinsic worth.

The views, ideas and opinions expressed listed here are the creator’s alone and don’t essentially mirror or characterize the views and opinions of Cointelegraph.

Bert Kozma is a author and an affiliate editor at Cryptogeek.information. Beforehand a gross sales and advertising and marketing professional, he has been an creator overlaying cryptocurrency and monetary markets for the final decade. He holds a bachelor’s diploma in worldwide enterprise from Saimaa College of Utilized Sciences.