Blockchain voting is the alternative for trusted democratic elections

152
SHARES
1.9k
VIEWS


The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted individuals’s lives, the connection between governments and residents, and your complete world financial system, and naturally, it has had a significant influence on america presidential election.

Resulting from social isolation, numerous American voters opted to vote by mail, which elevated vote counting time, led candidate and performing President Donald Trump to judicialize the electoral course of with actions in a number of states, and triggered intense debates in regards to the veracity and legitimacy of the present American electoral system.

Associated: Blockchain voting systems could be the future, but current flaws persist

The present voting system within the digital age

Presently, many have proposed “cellular” voting instead extra appropriate with present instances, permitting individuals to vote with out leaving their properties.

We’re capable of store on-line, there are professions which can be carried out 100% remotely — which has intensified with the present pandemic — however electoral participation nonetheless must be exercised in particular person and in a particular location.

Now, does this not go towards the digital age the place info and expertise function facilitators of communication, information switch and enterprise transactions?

How does one make cellular, or distant, voting attainable with out compromising the safety of electoral participation? The addition of blockchain options to the cellular voting course of may give confidence to the electoral system and produce peace to the electoral course of.

Associated: Electronic voting with blockchain: An experience from Naples, Italy

The mix of sequential hashing and cryptography in a distributed construction permits for the safety of voters’ identification and the verification of completely all votes entered within the blockchain platform, which may allow safe and clear voting mechanisms with electoral vote monitoring.

Think about how good it will be to verify in case your vote was truly counted for the candidate chosen by you, with absolutely the assure of the secrecy of your vote? All of that is attainable with blockchain expertise.

Associated: The promise and reality of blockchain’s role in global elections

American electoral jurisdictions and blockchain-based pilot tasks

Electoral jurisdictions in a number of U.S. states have examined mobile-application-based blockchain voting for state, federal and municipal elections — primarily to allow distant voting by navy and civilian residents overseas through smartphones and tablets, quite than the normal and mail, fax and paper strategies.

West Virginia, for instance, enabled mobile voting via blockchain for its state and federal elections again in 2018. Denver, Colorado; Utah County, Utah; and two counties within the state of Oregon additionally examined pilot tasks for his or her 2019 municipal elections. In whole, 29 counties in 5 states tested Voatz’s cellular voting app in official elections.

In the entire examples talked about above, to the shock of many and in accordance with the authorities answerable for voting through blockchain, the electoral course of proved to be simpler and extra accessible.

For that motive, there are already advocates of using blockchain in American elections.

The positions of American political personalities on cellular voting

Because of the nice efficiency talked about within the earlier paragraphs, there are already notable figures in American politics elevating the banner of blockchain cellular voting, akin to Bradley Tusk — an American businessman, philanthropist, political strategist and founding father of Tusk Philanthropies; Mike Queen — deputy chief of workers to the West Virginia Secretary of State; and Jocelyn Bucaro — director of elections in Denver.

However as a result of we live within the age of polarization, there are additionally individuals strongly towards cellular voting, together with voting through blockchain. In that sense, we will discuss with Jeremy Epstein, a member of the Affiliation for Computing Equipment’s US Expertise Coverage Committee. Right here, it is very important word that Epstein — who was a vice chair of the committee on the time — co-authored an electoral safety report titled “E mail and Web Voting: The Neglected Menace to Election Safety,” which was developed along with Frequent Trigger, the Nationwide Election Protection Coalition and the R Avenue Institute.

The report factors to blockchain and web voting as a goal for on-line assaults by overseas intelligence, saying the transmission of ballots over the web — together with by electronic mail, fax and blockchain methods — makes them susceptible.

Regardless of the professionals and cons, are there options already in place that may defend residents from electoral fraud? How would identification verification be used within the course of? What tasks and options can we consider implementing for identification verification within the voting course of, and the way would they work?

A blockchain resolution that may allow a digital election within the U.S.

The Voatz utility, for instance, seems to be for vulnerabilities and indicators of dedication or vulnerability from the beginning. If the app finds {that a} smartphone has been compromised, it doesn’t permit the person to vote. If the appliance passes safety exams and third-party instruments linked to it, the voter is authenticated on their cell phone by a fingerprint or facial recognition.

The voter then gives their authorities identification, often a driver’s license or passport, and takes a selfie for additional authentication. Lastly, the voter touches the fingerprint reader of their cellular phone to confirm that the smartphone is definitely within the voter’s arms. On this step, the Voatz utility combines the selfie taken by the voter with the picture of the identification doc and, after rechecking all of the registration info given, confirms that the voter can vote.

Voters can use their very own extra authentication issue, akin to an Apple Watch, Google Authenticator or a YubiKey. And if they want, they will nonetheless obtain an SMS message or electronic mail as an extra authentication issue.

Cybersecurity in a blockchain vote

Concerning cybersecurity, as “all” software program has vulnerabilities, it can’t be ignored that denial-of-service and distributed denial-of-service assaults are reliable risks in a cellular vote. Due to this fact, it is very important search for backup methods for attainable infrastructure failure within the case of a DoS assault on the cellular voting system.

The blockchain a part of the method is the least worrying by way of safety. It is only one element of the voting course of, which additionally consists of the steps of identification safety, verification and validation.

Blockchain, within the case of Voatz, is for the particular utility for which it was constructed: to distribute voting information in order that it’s harder to assault remotely. It additionally has cryptographic audit proof of every transaction.

The principle safety danger in voting through blockchain is within the interface with the electoral jurisdiction, the place the poll can be printed with a hash or encrypted key on prime. After it’s saved, it’s lastly digitized within the election methods and software program ballot-reading methods. At this stage, the electoral course of “is out of attain” for Voatz.

Along with cybersecurity points, one other level in a blockchain vote that has been questioned is: How would the voting ebook be processed and the ballots verified in a blockchain resolution?

Taking the Voatz app for instance once more, it makes use of a 32-node blockchain infrastructure on Amazon Net Companies and Microsoft Azure, every internet hosting 16 nodes in america. Cloudflare is amongst a number of firms that present DDoS-protection providers, and Voatz has mentioned that the system employs end-to-end encryption and multi-factor authentication for infrastructure nodes.

One other blockchain voting resolution was utilized in Colombia in 2016. “Blockchain Voting for Peace” is a case study by the Organisation for Financial Cooperation and Improvement of a referendum held in Colombia again then. In it, the nonprofit group Democracy Earth Basis creates a blockchain platform to permit Colombians dwelling overseas to symbolically take part within the plebiscite on the peace treaty between the federal government and the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, generally generally known as FARC. The fascinating factor right here is the potential of democratic protection supplied by the blockchain.

Key takeaways

From what now we have seen up to now, it’s not an exaggeration to think about that within the close to future, many international locations will see blockchain expertise as a really perfect voting technique for a society that’s more and more digitized quicker than ever.

Nonetheless, even when the maturity of the expertise is reached and it successfully brings larger legitimacy to the electoral course of and veracity to the voting system, will we have the ability to overcome the cultural limitations and digital illiteracy that also exist in immediately’s world?

The views, ideas and opinions expressed listed below are the creator’s alone and don’t essentially mirror or characterize the views and opinions of Cointelegraph.

Tatiana Revoredo is a founding member of the Oxford Blockchain Basis and is a strategist in blockchain at Saïd Enterprise College on the College of Oxford. Moreover, she is an knowledgeable in blockchain enterprise purposes at MIT and is the chief technique officer of The World Technique. Tatiana has been invited by the European Parliament to the Intercontinental Blockchain Convention and was invited by the Brazilian parliament to the general public listening to on Invoice 2303/2015. She is the creator of two books: Blockchain: Tudo O Que Você Precisa Saber and Cryptocurrencies within the Worldwide State of affairs: What Is the Place of Central Banks, Governments and Authorities About Cryptocurrencies?